|PRISON PLANET.com Copyright © 2002-2005 Alex Jones All rights reserved.|
New York and Washington. Bali, Riyadh, Istanbul, Madrid. And now London.
When will it end? Where will it all lead?
The experts arent encouraged. One prominent terrorism researcher sees the prospect of endless war. Adds the man who tracked Osama bin Laden for the CIA, I dont think its even started yet.
An Associated Press survey of longtime students of international terrorism finds them ever more convinced, in the aftermath of Londons bloody Thursday, that the world has entered a long siege in a new kind of war. They believe that al-Qaida is mutating into a global insurgency, a possible prototype for other 21st-century movements, technologically astute, almost leaderless. And the way out is far from clear.
In fact, says Michael Scheuer, the ex-CIA analyst, rather than move toward solutions, the United States took a big step backward by invading Iraq.
Now, he said, were at the point where jihad is self-sustaining, where Islamic holy warriors in Iraq fight America with or without allegiance to al-Qaidas bin Laden.
The cold statistics of a RAND Corp. database show the impact of the explosion of violence in Iraq: The 5,362 deaths from terrorism worldwide between March 2004 and March 2005 were almost double the total for the same 12-month period before the 2003 U.S. invasion.
Thursdays attacks on Londons transit system mirrored last years bombings of Madrid commuter trains, and both point to an al-Qaida evolving into a movement whose isolated leaders offer video or Internet inspiration but little more to local jihadists who carry out the strikes.
Although no arrests have been made in the London attacks, a group using al-Qaidas name made a claim of responsibility, otherwise unconfirmed. Experts say the bombings bore hallmarks of al-Qaida.
The movements evolution has given rise to a virtual network that is extremely adaptable, said Jonathan Stevenson, of the International Institute for Strategic Studies Washington office.
The movement adapted, for example, by switching from targeting aviation, where security was reinforced after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, to the softer targets of mass transit.
Such compartmentalized groupings, in touch electronically but with little central control, are going to be a prototype for understanding where terrorist movements are going in the 21st century, said the University of North Carolinas Cynthia Combs, co-author of a terrorism encyclopedia.
Combs said the so-called Earth and Animal Liberation fronts in the United States are examples if less lethal ones of leaderless militant movements based on isolated cells. She also said its not unrealistic that another American example far-right militia cells might make common cause someday with foreign terrorists against the U.S. government.
Bruce Hoffman, the veteran RAND Corp. specialist who fears an endless war, dismisses talk of al-Qaidas back having been broken by the capture of some leaders.
From the terrorists point of view, it seems they have calculated they need to do just one significant terrorist attack a year in another capital, and it regenerates the same fear and anxieties, said Hoffman, who was an adviser to the U.S. occupation in Iraq.
What should be broken, he said, is the cycle of terrorist recruitment through the generations. Here you come to the main challenge.
He and most of the other half-dozen experts said the worlds richer powers must address underlying causes lessen the appeal of radicalism by improving economies, political rights and education in Arab and Muslim countries.
Combs cited bin Ladens use of Afghanistan as his 1990s headquarters. If we hadnt been ignoring Afghanistan and instead offered real assistance, would it have become a base for bin Laden? she asked.
Not all agree this is an answer. Stephen Sloan, another veteran scholar in the field, prescribes stoicism.
The American, British and other target publics must give their intelligence and police agencies time to close ranks globally and crush the challenge, said Sloan, of the University of Central Florida.
The public has to have the resolve to face the reality there will be other incidents, he said.
Scheuer, who headed the CIAs bin Laden unit for nine years, sees a different way out through U.S. foreign policy. He said he resigned last November to expose the U.S. leaderships willful blindness to what needs to be done: withdraw the U.S. military from the Mideast, end unqualified support for Israel, sever close ties to Arab oil-state tyrannies.
He acknowledged such actions arent likely soon, but said his longtime subject bin Laden will make us bleed enough to get our attention. Ultimately, he said, his goal is to destroy the Arab monarchies.
For James Kirkhope, the outlook is depressing.
His Washington consultancy, Terrorism Research Center, sometimes red-teams for U.S. authorities, playing a role in exercises, thinking like terrorist leaders. That thinking increasingly seems focused on a struggle for Islamic supremacy lasting hundreds of years, he said.
And for the moment they just want to be kept on our radar screen, Kirkhope said. For all the terror and carnage, he said, last weeks London attacks carried a simple message: Were still around.