NAVIGATION |
|
|
THE ALEX JONES
SHOW |
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES |
|
|
|
SPECIAL REPORTS |
|
|
|
|
LINKS |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| CONTACT |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ADVERTISEMENTS
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Survivalism Goes Mainstream As Middle Class And Wealthy Fear Breakdown
Of Society Darryl Mason
Your
New Reality
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
I have the strangest feeling
we are about to see some elements of survivalism hitting the mainstream
media in a huge way, as soon as Britney Spears, George Clooney or
Kate Moss announce they keep food stockpiles, grow their own vegetables
and maintain isolated cottages to escape to when water riots and
bank runs turn cities in combat zones.
Soon we will see a spread in something like
Vanity Fair of six movie and music stars listing what they keep
in their survivalist stockpiles, or showing off their organic veggie
patches at their secret 'haven'.
The New York Times gets busy marketing the
new, less threatening, survivalism :
(Article continues below)
The traditional face of survivalism is
that of a shaggy loner in camouflage, holed up in a cabin in the
wilderness and surrounded by cases of canned goods and ammunition.
It is not that of Barton M. Biggs, the
former chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley.
“Your safe haven must be self-sufficient
and capable of growing some kind of food,” Mr. Biggs writes.
“It should be well-stocked with seed, fertilizer, canned food,
wine, medicine, clothes, etc. Think Swiss Family Robinson. Even
in America and Europe there could be moments of riot and rebellion
when law and order temporarily completely breaks down.”
Survivalism, it seems, is not just for survivalists
anymore.
Faced with a confluence of diverse threats
— a tanking economy, a housing crisis, looming environmental
disasters, and a sharp spike in oil prices — people who do
not consider themselves extremists are starting to discuss doomsday
measures once associated with the social fringes.
They stockpile or grow food in case of a
supply breakdown, or buy precious metals in case of economic collapse.
Some try to take their houses off the electricity grid, or plan
safe houses far away. The point is not to drop out of society, but
to be prepared in case the future turns out like something out of
“An Inconvenient Truth,” if not “Mad Max.”
“I’m not a gun-nut, camo-wearing
skinhead. I don’t even hunt or fish,” said Bill Marcom,
53, a construction executive in Dallas.
“If all these planets line up and
things do get really bad,” Mr. Marcom said, “those who
have not prepared will be trapped in the city with thousands of
other people needing food and propane and everything else.”
“You just can’t help wonder if
there’s a train wreck coming,” said David Anderson,
50, a database administrator in Colorado Springs who said he was
moved by economic uncertainties and high energy prices, among other
factors, to stockpile months’ worth of canned goods in his
basement for his wife, his two young children and himself.
(A) book, “The Long Emergency”
(Atlantic Monthly Press, 2005), by James Howard Kunstler, an author
and journalist who writes about economic and environmental issues,
argues that American suburbs and cities may soon lay desolate as
people, starved of oil, are forced back to the land to adopt a hardscrabble,
19th-century-style agrarian life.
Some middle-class preparedness converts,
like Val Vontourne, a musician and paralegal in Olympia, Wash.,
recoil at the term “survivalist,” even as they stock
their homes with food, gasoline and water.
“I now think of storing extra food, water, medicine and gasoline
in the same way I think of buying health insurance...It just makes
sense.”
Anything that encourages more people to grow
their own vegetables and herbs, and put away a bit of food and water
just in case, is a positive.
|
|
|